Monday, June 13, 2011

artful dodger oliver

images friends as the Artful Dodger.quot; artful dodger oliver. the Artful Dodger. Oliver
  • the Artful Dodger. Oliver


  • nb_des
    09-21 11:33 AM
    One more question:

    When we create a application can we add any member with in the same group. My friend and myself are planning to visit India during the same time. We both are in 8th year extension and work for different companies. Both of us have to get VISA stamped. Can we create in the same application(ofcourse we need to create new application for each one after you create for one person) so that when we want to change dates like prepone or postpone it will be easy for us to modify the appointment date in one click. As dates keep changing every day/hour it will be easy for any one of us to monitor the available dates and change. We can change the dates only once and if we want do it again we need to cancel the appt and create a new one.
    I dont think you can do that.




    wallpaper the Artful Dodger. Oliver artful dodger oliver. Madge as the Artful Dodger
  • Madge as the Artful Dodger


  • deardar
    07-06 10:55 AM
    Brother why ?




    artful dodger oliver. OLIVER AND THE ARTFUL DODGER .
  • OLIVER AND THE ARTFUL DODGER .


  • usgc07
    02-15 08:27 AM
    :confused:

    Gurus,
    Please advise.
    Can a spouse of Green card holder get an H1b visa.
    Spouse is currently studying MBA final sem.
    She has 3 year industry work experience.

    An US based corporation might be willing to sponser her h1b visa because she has worked for their indian counterparty.

    The question :
    Her husband is a green card holder and she must disclose it either on the H1B petition or at the time of visa interview.
    What are chances of her obtaining h1b visa ?
    I heard H1B is a dual intent visa.

    Thanks in advance for your time and efforts on this issue.

    USGC07




    2011 Madge as the Artful Dodger artful dodger oliver. Characters: The Artful Dodger,
  • Characters: The Artful Dodger,


  • arindamb
    03-25 08:44 PM
    I feel "related" might be the key word that can cause discomfort for a lot of people. How does one determine that ones job is related to his/her degree ? This might finally be left upto the discretion of the USCIS.

    One might have studied electrical engineering and then get in a job writing embedded systems software. Will that be a related job ?
    One might have an MS in Biological sciences but might be writing software for genetics. Is that a related job ? The list can go on.

    How far can one digress from ones degree major to still be considered related.
    I presume we might see a lot of confusion regarding STEM if the whole thing is made into a law.



    more...

    artful dodger oliver. as the Artful Dodger,
  • as the Artful Dodger,


  • asdfgh
    11-27 11:58 PM
    Finished FP this morning. Got LUD on 485 45 mins after FP completion. Status language changed from

    "The I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was transferred and is now pending standard processing at a USCIS office. You will be notified by mail when a decision is made, or if the office needs something from you...blah..blah..blah"

    to

    "On October 9, 2007, we transferred this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS to our LINCOLN, NE location for processing because they now have jurisdiction over the case...blah..blah..blah"

    Then got second LUD this evening with a 11/28 date on it, even though it was still 11/27, even on East coast. No change in mesg.

    Any thoughts???




    artful dodger oliver. He#39;d do anything for you,
  • He#39;d do anything for you,


  • deba
    04-13 05:40 PM
    Correct me if I am wrong...but I believe a bill has to pass in both Senate and Congress and signed by President to be enacted into law. Currently the H1/EB bills are only presented in Senate. Any comments?



    more...

    artful dodger oliver. Characters: The Artful Dodger,
  • Characters: The Artful Dodger,


  • gbof
    06-03 06:09 PM
    Hi All,
    My company applied 485 and h1b. I am in AOS status and having EAD. My company laid off me on March and they are not revoke my h1b and 140(they may hire me back once get new job). Mean time shall i work hourly job and get around $1200 per month with same job description with using my EAD(new company will run payroll and W2). Also i am keep looking permanent full time job with my higher salary.

    For the hourly job they asking to fill I-9(employment eligibility verification will inform USCIS). On that form asking my A# with EAD expiration date.

    Is there a chance USCIS will know my hourly job?. My concern - this hourly job will create a problem for my GC process (chance to get REF) because rate is low

    Please give me your valuable suggestion

    Thanks

    Sorry for your situition and I wish you good luck in finding job. It is hard to survice and maintain legal status in current economy. Are you really without job since mar09 ?. My understanding on this is : for the primary-AOS big salary cut or raise can become a issue later.

    Guys, please, throw some light if there is any time limit for primary-AOS to get a job to stay in status?




    2010 OLIVER AND THE ARTFUL DODGER . artful dodger oliver. friends as the Artful Dodger.quot;
  • friends as the Artful Dodger.quot;


  • dealsnet
    11-19 01:49 PM
    It is reported in TOI
    25,000 onsite H-1B inspections - Software & Services-News-Indiatimes - Infotech (http://infotech.indiatimes.com/news/software-services/25000-onsite-H-1B-inspections-/articleshow/5246611.cms)



    more...

    artful dodger oliver. The Artful Dodger
  • The Artful Dodger


  • floridasun
    01-27 02:37 PM
    Congratulations - enjoy your FREEDOM ! BTW I have the same priority date - only one trivial difference - EB 3 :eek:

    We recd. our 485 approval last week and recd. the cards in the mail earlier this week. We were interviewed at the local USCIS for our 485's, 2 weeks ago. It went really smooth and case was approved the same day as the interview.

    I would like to whole-heartedly thank IV core and all IV members. This site has been an amazing resource of information & support for us thru our journey. I became a IV member during the July 2007 fiasco. We were there at the IV rally in DC in Sept 2007, have attended local chapter meetings. We will continue to support IV in it's mission.

    Thanks everybody.!

    EB-II (India)
    PD - April 2006
    Filed 485 (spouse & myself) - July 2007
    485 Approved / Cards recd - January 2011.




    hair Characters: The Artful Dodger, artful dodger oliver. The Artful Dodger (Isa),
  • The Artful Dodger (Isa),


  • mittal_a
    06-26 02:45 PM
    I did the address change long back and got the LUD for the same reason way back.

    Thanks
    Amit Mittal



    more...

    artful dodger oliver. Make an Artful Dodger costume
  • Make an Artful Dodger costume


  • freddy22
    04-25 02:32 PM
    Thats why If you dont want to live here, move out. Why are you yelling here.

    First control your son for his stupid behaviour. Then start talking about america.

    I looked into all your old posts. See your son is involved in how many felonies

    1 felony on record;

    no FELONIES...
    and remember this DUFUS it was US from England that discovered YOUR country...not AMERICANS
    So stuff that where it needs to be stuffed




    hot as the Artful Dodger, artful dodger oliver. quot;The Artful Dodgerquot;
  • quot;The Artful Dodgerquot;


  • bec
    11-04 06:36 PM
    Hey i was so happy to read that EB3 was current in your post, but got disappointed after i read your msg :(

    I dont think we can change the title, the moderators have to change it !!!!

    you can change it.



    more...

    house Characters: The Artful Dodger, artful dodger oliver. The Artful Dodger Austin
  • The Artful Dodger Austin


  • pdakwala
    04-29 12:00 AM
    Thanks for your continuous support.

    Who says that we will not succeed in removing the current retrogression.
    Who says that IV can not achieve anything.

    When you do some thing from the heart you can't go wrong. IV members are contributing second, third, fourth and some even fifth time. This shows the confidence level. Keep it up. You all have made us proud immigrants.

    Thanks to all those who have contributed.




    tattoo He#39;d do anything for you, artful dodger oliver. for The Artful Dodger
  • for The Artful Dodger


  • gondalguru
    07-26 06:38 PM
    Just on the lighter note I wonder if even USCIS ignores that mistake and give you and your co-worker's wife a GC.

    And if your co-worker's wife is from a county which is not retrogressed then you can get GC early based on alternate chargebility. Mistake can become boon many times. Just kidding.

    Probably you will get RFE and not rejection.



    more...

    pictures Characters: The Artful Dodger, artful dodger oliver. artful dodger oliver twist.
  • artful dodger oliver twist.


  • humdesi
    05-31 08:53 PM
    A friend of mine just came from India. Works for a bodyshopper. He is transferring to L-1A so that he can file in EB-1 multinational manager. Is this possible? What are the minimum requirements for EB-1?

    If it is possible this guy will be laughing a year from now, gc in hand, while we all fume and fret over retrogression, labor, i-140 etc..




    dresses quot;The Artful Dodgerquot; artful dodger oliver. musical OLIVER in 1960.
  • musical OLIVER in 1960.


  • gcdeena
    01-29 03:13 PM
    try POJO method to reach IO. You can find in "n" number of threads to reach IO based upon your service center. but it's based on your luck to get polite and cordial IO. Try multiple times and speak politely.

    Posting this info. provided by some one in this forum long time back.

    Call 1-800-375-5283
    Press 1 to select English
    Press 2 to skip introduction
    Press 2
    Press 6 to find case status information
    Press 1
    Now enter your receipt number SRCxxxxxxxxxx
    Voice asks if SRC press 1
    Then reads out application number, if correct, press 1 (now listen to the case update info..blah blah)
    Part way through the blah blah press 3
    Wait a moment and press 4
    (now if you hear a male voice telling you that no IO is available, it will redirect it to National Customer Service Center (NCSC) you can cut the phone.. and try the same steps)
    You should hear "You have reached the TSC of USCIS�" OTHERWISE you have been bounced to NCSC. NCSC only sees what you see when you login to check case status at https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/index.jsp i.e. you will not get any useful information out of them.

    Once you get an IO, be very polite, and take notes for your records. Ask them for their badge number. That way you can reference each conversation by date and the badge number of the IO.

    Some of the standard questions:
    1) Name check Status ?
    2) Background Check Status ?
    3) Has it been assigned to an officer ?
    4) When can I expect to get some updates on my case ?
    5) Can you help me with a ball park date on when my case will be assigned to an officer?

    Ofcourse, we all are aware of the standard response we get.



    more...

    makeup The Artful Dodger artful dodger oliver. Characters: The Artful Dodger,
  • Characters: The Artful Dodger,


  • jungalee43
    02-28 04:46 PM
    I am joining for sure. Members please respond.




    girlfriend for The Artful Dodger artful dodger oliver. Artful Dodger and Oliver,
  • Artful Dodger and Oliver,


  • ras
    08-09 10:48 PM
    I was wondering if we could have on this site some reliable information about the most important aspects of GC processing. People are posting a lot all the time and asking the same things all over again, and while many answers are pertinent, we must realize not everyone knows the laws and rules.Not to mention how much time it takes to search the threads and find what you want to know. If there was a place where they could lookup the information they need and this information would be provided by knowledgeable persons, like admins or moderators, not other members, maybe we could avoid having so many threads and posts.I understand that would involve some effort, but in the end there would not be so much need to go thru all the posts and make sure people are not misleading others or create panic.
    Of course, this is stil a forum and it's only natural to have people expressing themselves, but maybe in that situation they would not have to post so much and use the space on the servers.

    Thank you

    And please dont tie even this post again asking him to contribute. Contribution is a different issue. Atleast there are some other things that doesn't need financial contribution but organizational contribution.




    hairstyles Make an Artful Dodger costume artful dodger oliver. Fagin the Artful Dodger
  • Fagin the Artful Dodger


  • Blog Feeds
    08-31 09:40 AM
    USCIS has released a new interim memo which clarified the method of analysis by USCIS officers that they must use in adjudicating Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers, filed for 1) Alien of Extraordinary Ability EB1A cases; 2) Outstanding Professor or Researcher EB1B cases; and 3) Alien of Exceptional Ability EB2 cases. The requirements for these types of I-140 petitions have not changed but this new method of evaluating the merits of cases may adversely impact those applying for immigration in these categories. This interim memo is a response to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Kazarian v. USCIS on March 4, 2010. In the Kazarian ruling, the court held that USCIS was being too strict in deciding EB1A petitions by requiring extensive citation evidence and specific types of peer review work in order to meet the EB1A criteria. However, the court did rule that USCIS could consider evidence such as extensive citations in making a final merits review of the case to determine whether an alien is at the very top of his or her field.

    In essence, the new USCIS interim memo breaks the evaluation process up into two parts � 1) evaluating whether the applicant meets the baseline criteria for the immigration category and 2) determining whether the applicant�s evidence demonstrates the required high level of expertise for the immigration category. In the second part of the review process the USCIS will evaluate the evidence to see if, as a whole, it proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the applicant is at the very top of his or her field of endeavor. This article will explain how the evaluation will be handled for affected EB1A and EB1B I-140 petitions.

    For the first step in evaluating EB1A cases, the officer will check to see if evidence is provided to show that the applicant has met at least three of the following ten criteria:

    1. Documentation of the alien's receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor;

    2. Documentation of the alien's membership in associations in the field for which classification is sought, which require outstanding achievements of their members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their disciplines or fields;

    3. Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media relating to the alien's work in the field for which classification is sought;

    4. Evidence of the alien's participation, either individually or on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specialization for which classification is sought;

    5. Evidence of the alien's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field;

    6. Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media;

    7. Evidence of the display of the alien's work in the field at artistic exhibitions or showcases;

    8. Evidence that the alien has performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have a distinguished reputation;

    9. Evidence that the alien has commanded a high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services, in relation to others in the field;

    10. Evidence of commercial successes in the performing arts, as shown by box office receipts or record, cassette, compact disk, or video sales.

    After the officer has determined by a preponderance of the evidence that at least three of these criterion have been met, he or she moves into the second part of the review. For EB1A cases, the second part of the review involves determining whether the applicant has achieved a level of expertise indicating that he or she is one of a small percentage who has risen to the very top of the field of endeavor, he or she has shown sustained national or international acclaim, and his or her achievements have been recognized in the field of expertise. This basically means that the officer will look at all the evidence as a whole and determine if the case is approvable. This new standard may decrease the number of approved cases since, by implementing this secondary review process, USCIS officers have the discretion to deny cases even if three EB1A criteria have been technically met.

    New Evaluation Process For EB1B Cases

    For the first step in evaluating EB1B cases, the officer will check to see if evidence is provided to show that the applicant has met at least two of the following six criteria:

    1. Documentation of the alien's receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor;

    2. Documentation of the alien's membership in associations in the field for which classification is sought, which require outstanding achievements of their members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their disciplines or fields;

    3. Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media relating to the alien's work in the field for which classification is sought;

    4. Evidence of the alien's participation, either individually or on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specialization for which classification is sought;

    5. Evidence of the alien's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field;

    6. Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media;

    For the second part of the review for EB1B cases, the officer will make a final merit determination on whether or not the applicant has, by a preponderance of the evidence, demonstrated that he or she is recognized internationally as outstanding in a specific academic area. Therefore, simply showing that two of the criterion have been met does not necessarily mean that the case will be approved. This, in turn, greatly expands the USCIS officer�s discretion in deciding which cases to approve.

    Prior to this USCIS memo, the evidence was evaluated only in the context of meeting the necessary criteria for each type of case. Now by adding a second �final determination on the merits� phase of review, USCIS officers have more flexibility in denying cases or issuing Request For Evidence notices even if the baseline criteria has been met. This memo essentially gives the USCIS officer wider discretion in adjudicating EB1 cases since it has added a new level of review which follows a fairly subjective standard. As a result it is very possible that immigration through the EB1A, EB1B, and EB2 Exceptional Ability categories will become more difficult than it has been in the past. However, due to the recent immigrant visa retrogression for people born in India and China, there is an increasing number of Chinese and Indians who choose to apply through the EB1A or EB1B categories rather than wait for visa availability in the EB2 category. Hence, we recommend to consult a qualified immigration professional before proceeding with EB1 and EB2 cases.




    More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/08/eb1_new_review_processes_based.html)




    ags123
    08-29 11:17 AM
    Thanks, Roseball. Thats another thing I am not clear on what they will do with I-140. My prev employer had told me they wouldnt withdraw the I-140 and they would revoke H1 after 90 days. It is exactly 6 months since then. So I am guessing they sent in the H1 revocation 3 months ago and CSC has opened it and cancelled H1 now after 3 more months.

    I am hoping they will stick to their word of not withdrawing I-140. However as in my case I was part of a large layoff and I dont know if the lawyers may push employer to witdhraw I-140 just to make some cash withdrawing I-140 for every laid off person.
    (In my case I am lucky enough to have the same lawyer represent me in the new company, however they wont discuss anything related to what they do for the old company as it is company confidential. So what happens on approved I-140 is a mystery)

    The flip side is that it is only 1 week when I am outside I dont know if my luck is that bad that something happens during this one week. I guess no one will have the answer

    Anyways have booked tickets so will watch LUD,status etc till the last minute and then take a chance for one week I guess.




    purgan
    05-02 11:24 AM
    Just as Robert Rector said yesterday that High Skill Immigration needs to be "encouraged", today we have Loo Dobbs shedding sympathy for legal immigrants like ourselves stuck in the backlog...

    It would be tempting to believe in words of Rector and Dobbs, however whenever the time comes to provide relief to legal immigrants like ourselves, they show their true Anti-Immigrant colors. How many times have you heard of Rector and Dobbs advocating backlog relief??? Not once....nada, zilch, zero times.

    This is precisely why people like Rector and Dobbs have zero credibility on even legal immigration...



    ===

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/05/01/Dobbs.May2/index.html

    What a spectacle, what a mess. What a day for thousands and thousands of illegal aliens and their supporters to march through the streets of many of our biggest cities demanding amnesty for illegally entering the country.

    Tuesday was given over to illegal aliens and their supporters to demand forgiveness for using fraudulent documents and assisting others in entering this country illegally. What a day for illegal aliens and their supporters to demand not only amnesty but also the end to immigration raids and an end to deportations.

    May Day was a peculiar choice for those demonstrations, a day in many countries in which international socialism is celebrated and a reminder of those old Soviet Union military parades.

    It was also an unfortunate and ironic choice on the part of the organizers of the demonstrations. May 1 in the United States is actually Law Day, a day first established by President Eisenhower in 1958 and ultimately codified into law in 1961 at the beginning of John F. Kennedy's administration. The purpose of Law Day is to give all Americans an opportunity to reflect on our legal heritage, and by statute, encourages "the cultivation of the respect for law that is so vital to the democratic way of life."

    I'll bet you know about the illegal alien amnesty marches, but I don't know of a single news organization, electronic or print that pointed out that May 1 is America's Law Day. The cable news networks gave almost wall-to-wall coverage to the illegal alien demonstrations, but they apparently couldn't find any American celebrating Law Day.

    And no one seems to want to take note that we are first a nation of laws, and that without those laws and their enforcement, the foundation of our great republic turns to sand. What a spectacle on Law Day for demonstrators to demand amnesty for those who broke the law to enter our country, many of whom also broke the law with fraudulent documents.

    And what a mess when the president of the United States and the U.S. Congress are pandering to a group of people who are not citizens and refuse to demand enforcement of our immigration laws, our criminal laws, and fails to secure our borders and ports.

    I couldn't help but wonder as I watched monitors bringing images of the marches and demonstrations from all across the country, who should really be protesting on May Day. What about the millions of legal residents who followed the long, drawn-out process to secure a visa to enter the United States lawfully? Maybe they should be protesting. What about the seven-figure backlog at the Citizenship and Immigration Services agency of people who are following the rules. Should they demonstrate?
    What about all of our fellow Americans who are being marginalized by the massive importation of illegal, low-cost and mostly uneducated labor into this country? Perhaps those citizens should take to the streets. And what about the more than 250 million Americans who make up our middle class and those who aspire to it whose wages have stagnated and who are paying for the social, medical and economic costs of illegal immigration? That's a big march.

    If yesterday's demonstrators and their supporters in Congress and corporate America are serious about their deep desire for American citizenship, why don't we hear any of them clearly say they're willing to give up dual citizenship? Or that they're willing to learn English and surrender demands of bilingual education? Or declare they embrace English as our official national language? Or demand that illegal employers of illegal aliens pay for the social, educational and medical costs now borne by the taxpayers?

    Yesterday was Law Day. I hope that we celebrate Law Day with a great national enthusiasm next May 1. I guarantee you I'll march in that demonstration.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment